Şenol Cantek, L. Funda. Yaban'lar ve Yerliler: Başkent Olma
Sürecinde Ankara. İstanbul: İletişim, 2003, 373pp.
ABSTRACT
“Strangers” and Natives: Ankara in the Course of
Becoming a Capital City
Yaban'lar ve
Yerliler: Başkent Olma Sürecinde Ankara
Şenol Cantek considers the transformation of
Ankara during the transitional period which marks the end of the Ottoman Empire
and the beginning of the Turkish Republic, emphasising its reconstruction as
the capital city of the new regime. The book aims to offer an alternative
discourse to official history. Therefore, it refers to a wide range of sources
encompassing not only those which represent the dominant state discourse but
also the written and oral testimonies reflecting a variety of perspectives. The
book consists of twelve basic chapters in addition to an appendix which
includes brief biographical accounts of those interviewed by the author.
Şenol Cantek focuses on the shift of
identity during this period. The Ottoman identity was portrayed as “other”
during the establishment of the Turkish Republic. The new regime was determined
to become a part of Western civilisation, detaching itself from the bonds of
Islam and tradition, which resulted in a conception of national identity based
on “Turkish” ideals. According to Şenol Cantek, Ankara, which was considered an
alternative to Istanbul, became a capital city as an important phase of this
nationalisation project. A rural city that offered a life style determined by
traditional and religious values became the starting point of “Turkish”
urbanisation, a living space for ideal Turkish citizens, and Westernised and
modern everyday practices. The author details the clashes between the natives
of the city and those who came from outside to actualise this project; he uses
the equivocal Turkish word yaban, which means both “stranger” and
“savage”. Şenol Cantek concludes that the natives were exposed to the
orientalist gaze of those who came to construct Ankara, while the outsiders
were viewed as strangers by the natives. As a result, Ankara became a meeting
place of “the savages” and “the strangers”.
Yaban’lar ve Yerliler is a study which
accomplishes its goal of offering an alternative narrative to the official
history to a large extent. It is a unique book as it views written and oral
accounts not just as historical documents, but as sources that deserve
discourse analysis within their own contexts and conditions. Its approach to
the subject from an interdisciplinary perspective with substantial references
to architecture, history, sociology, communication, and literature renders the
book exceptional.
Hivren Demir-Atay
Şenol Cantek, L. Funda. Yaban'lar ve Yerliler: Başkent Olma
Sürecinde Ankara. İstanbul: İletişim, 2003, 373pp.
ABSTRACT
“Strangers” and Natives: Ankara in the Course of
Becoming a Capital City
Yaban'lar ve
Yerliler: Başkent Olma Sürecinde Ankara
Şenol Cantek considers the transformation of
Ankara during the transitional period which marks the end of the Ottoman Empire
and the beginning of the Turkish Republic, emphasising its reconstruction as
the capital city of the new regime. The book aims to offer an alternative
discourse to official history. Therefore, it refers to a wide range of sources
encompassing not only those which represent the dominant state discourse but
also the written and oral testimonies reflecting a variety of perspectives. The
book consists of twelve basic chapters in addition to an appendix which
includes brief biographical accounts of those interviewed by the author.
Şenol Cantek focuses on the shift of
identity during this period. The Ottoman identity was portrayed as “other”
during the establishment of the Turkish Republic. The new regime was determined
to become a part of Western civilisation, detaching itself from the bonds of
Islam and tradition, which resulted in a conception of national identity based
on “Turkish” ideals. According to Şenol Cantek, Ankara, which was considered an
alternative to Istanbul, became a capital city as an important phase of this
nationalisation project. A rural city that offered a life style determined by
traditional and religious values became the starting point of “Turkish”
urbanisation, a living space for ideal Turkish citizens, and Westernised and
modern everyday practices. The author details the clashes between the natives
of the city and those who came from outside to actualise this project; he uses
the equivocal Turkish word yaban, which means both “stranger” and
“savage”. Şenol Cantek concludes that the natives were exposed to the
orientalist gaze of those who came to construct Ankara, while the outsiders
were viewed as strangers by the natives. As a result, Ankara became a meeting
place of “the savages” and “the strangers”.
Yaban’lar ve Yerliler is a study which
accomplishes its goal of offering an alternative narrative to the official
history to a large extent. It is a unique book as it views written and oral
accounts not just as historical documents, but as sources that deserve
discourse analysis within their own contexts and conditions. Its approach to
the subject from an interdisciplinary perspective with substantial references
to architecture, history, sociology, communication, and literature renders the
book exceptional.
Hivren Demir-Atay