Caren S. Martin - <div><div>Evidence-based design (EBD) is an innovation to the normative design process for practitioners who strive to base design solutions on measurable outcomes. Published information about EBD—its purpose, process, and outcomes springs primarily from healthcare design sources. Little is known about the adoption of an EBD-approach by practitioners of other building types (offices, schools) or their degree of engagement with EBD. This study examined non-healthcare focused design practitioners’ current 1) understanding of EBD, 2) degree of implementation of EBD, and 3) interest in learning more about EBD as determined from an exploratory study via interviews of 10 multidisciplinary firms’ leaders. Findings indicated that these firms practiced normative design, having little knowledge of or engagement with EBD. To help identify reasons for this delay towards EBD, a comparative analysis of EBD-approaches in books published for design practitioners was conducted. It revealed a broad range of approaches, limited timelines for implementation, and promotion of practitioner/researcher collaborations. Additional resources/tools are needed by the non-healthcare focused design practitioners to support implementation of an EBD-approach into their normative design process.</div><div><br></div><div>Keywords: Evidence-based design (EBD); Non-healthcare design; Design practitioner; Normative design; Measurable outcomes.</div></div><div><br></div>
Implementation of Evidence-Based Design (EDB) by Non-Healthcare Design Practitioners
Type
journal article
Year
2014
Evidence-based design (EBD) is an innovation to the normative design process for practitioners who strive to base design solutions on measurable outcomes. Published information about EBD—its purpose, process, and outcomes springs primarily from healthcare design sources. Little is known about the adoption of an EBD-approach by practitioners of other building types (offices, schools) or their degree of engagement with EBD. This study examined non-healthcare focused design practitioners’ current 1) understanding of EBD, 2) degree of implementation of EBD, and 3) interest in learning more about EBD as determined from an exploratory study via interviews of 10 multidisciplinary firms’ leaders. Findings indicated that these firms practiced normative design, having little knowledge of or engagement with EBD. To help identify reasons for this delay towards EBD, a comparative analysis of EBD-approaches in books published for design practitioners was conducted. It revealed a broad range of approaches, limited timelines for implementation, and promotion of practitioner/researcher collaborations. Additional resources/tools are needed by the non-healthcare focused design practitioners to support implementation of an EBD-approach into their normative design process.

Keywords: Evidence-based design (EBD); Non-healthcare design; Design practitioner; Normative design; Measurable outcomes.

Citation
Martin, Caren S. "Implementation of Evidence-Based Design (EDB) by Non-Healthcare Design Practitioners." Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, vol. 8, issue 3 (2014): 165-180.
Parent Publications
Authorities
Copyright
Caren S. Martin, licensed under CC-BY-ND-NC
Language
English